Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to 1 Corinthians · About this commentary
The Rights of an Apostle
1 Corinthians 9:1-12
1 Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Haven’t I seen Jesus Christ, our Lord? Aren’t you my work in the Lord? · WEB
Paul establishes at length that he had every right to be supported — from common sense, from the law, and from the other apostles' practice — in order to say he never used it.
Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Haven't I seen Jesus Christ, our Lord? Aren't you my work in the Lord? 1 Corinthians 9:1.
Four questions, each expecting yes. The chapter looks like a digression and is not: he has just asked the strong to give up a right for their brothers' sake 1 Corinthians 8:13, and now offers himself as the worked example. But first the right has to be shown to be real, or the surrender proves nothing.
Have we no right to eat and to drink? Have we no right to take along a wife who is a believer, even as the rest of the apostles, and the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas? 1 Corinthians 9:4–5.
The claim is put concretely: food, and a wife traveling at the churches' expense. And the practice of others is cited — the other apostles, the Lord's brothers, and Peter by name, who is evidently married and accompanied. This is worth registering in a letter that also commends singleness 1 Corinthians 7:8: the man who preferred to remain unmarried names married colleagues without a hint of comparison.
What soldier ever serves at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard, and doesn't eat of its fruit? Or who feeds a flock, and doesn't drink from the flock's milk? 1 Corinthians 9:7.
Three everyday cases, all making one point: the worker eats from the work. Nobody funds his own military service or plants a vineyard for other people to enjoy.
For it is written in the law of Moses, "You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain." Is it for the oxen that God cares, or does he say it assuredly for our sake? 1 Corinthians 9:9–10.
Then the same principle from the law Deuteronomy 25:4, and the question is rhetorical in a particular way. God does care for animals Proverbs 12:10 Matthew 6:26; the argument is that a rule about a working ox exists because a principle stands behind it — the one who does the labor shares in its produce — and the principle reaches further than the ox. Paul cites the same text elsewhere for the support of elders 1 Timothy 5:17–18.
If we sowed to you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we reap your fleshly things? 1 Corinthians 9:11.
The exchange is weighed and found modest: they received the greater and are asked for the lesser. And then, having built the case for four verses more than he needed to, the turn: nevertheless we didn't use this right, but we bear all things, that we may cause no hindrance to the Good News of Christ 1 Corinthians 9:12. The right was real, provable, and conceded by everyone. He declined it so that nothing about him would slow the message down.
settled What this mark means