Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to 1 Peter · About this commentary
Better to Suffer for Doing Good
1 Peter 3:16-17
16 having a good conscience. Thus, while you are spoken against as evildoers, they may be disappointed who curse your good way of life in Christ. · WEB
The defense is a clear conscience rather than a successful argument, and the comparison in verse 17 is between two kinds of suffering, not between suffering and safety.
Verse 16 supplies what the answer of the previous verse rests on. A good conscience is named first, before any content, because the letter assumes the accusation will be about behavior rather than about ideas. The slander is quoted in the same terms used earlier: spoken against as evildoers 1 Peter 2:12.
What is hoped for is that the accusers will be put to shame — not refuted. The mechanism is the collision between what is said about these people and what is visible in them, and it works over time rather than in a conversation. The letter has already stated the larger hope that the same neighbors will end up glorifying God 1 Peter 2:12.
Verse 17 then states the comparison carefully, and the qualifier in the middle is easy to read past. If it should be God's will — suffering for doing good is not assumed to be automatic or inevitable, and the clause leaves it under a decision that is not the sufferer's.
The comparison itself is narrow. Better to suffer for doing good than for doing evil. It is not a claim that suffering is better than peace, and it does not say the good conduct will be recognized. It says only that of two ways to end up suffering, one leaves the conscience of verse 16 intact — and that is the whole ground the passage offers, which is why the next verse turns to the one case where it was proved.
settled What this mark means