Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Acts · About this commentary
Advice from a prisoner, overruled
Acts 27:9-12
9 When much time had passed and the voyage was now dangerous because the Fast had now already gone by, Paul admonished them · WEB
Paul warns against sailing and is outvoted by the professionals and the majority — a decision that was reasonable and wrong.
The date is given in a way that only a Jewish writer would use: the Fast had now already gone by. The Day of Atonement falls in late September or early October, and after it the sailing season closed. Voyages were regarded as dangerous from mid-September and as impossible from November.
So the situation is stated before the debate. The season has turned, the anchorage is poor, and everyone aboard knows both facts.
Paul's intervention is unexpected and the writer flags it: Paul admonished them. A prisoner offers navigational advice to a ship's council. He has been shipwrecked three times already by his own count 2 Corinthians 11:25, and has spent a night and a day in the open sea, so his opinion is not an amateur's — but it is still a passenger's, and he is in chains.
His warning is stated as a perception rather than a revelation: I perceive that the voyage will be with injury and much loss, not only of the cargo and the ship, but also of our lives. Nothing here is prophecy. There is no angel, no the Holy Spirit says, and the outcome as it happens differs from the forecast — the lives are spared. This is an experienced traveler reading the season and saying so, and the text presents it as such.
The decision goes against him, and the account of why is scrupulously fair to the men who made it. The centurion gave more heed to the master and to the owner of the ship than to those things which were spoken by Paul. The master is the sailing captain, the owner has the cargo at stake, and between them they represent the professional judgment available. Any officer would have weighed them above a prisoner.
Two further reasons are given. The haven was not suitable to winter in — a genuine problem, since an open roadstead offers no protection through three months of gales. And the majority advised going to sea. The vote was taken and Paul lost it.
The plan was modest. Not Italy, but Phoenix, a harbor forty miles further along the same coast with better shelter. A short hop in decent weather to a place they could sit out the winter.
Every element of the reasoning is sound, and the whole is a disaster. This is what makes the passage useful. The people who were wrong were the experts, they were the majority, their objection to staying was real, and their proposal was cautious. Being right about all of that did not make the sea safe, and the one dissenting voice belonged to the person with the least standing in the room.
settled What this mark means