Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Amos · About this commentary
Are You Not Like the Cushites
Amos 9:7-10
7 Are you not like the children of the Ethiopians to me, children of Israel?” says Yahweh. “Haven’t I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt, and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir? · WEB
The exodus is affirmed and its exclusivity denied in one sentence, and then the sieve is described as keeping rather than losing.
The question in verse 7 is the sharpest thing said to Israel in the book. Are you not like the Cushites to me, children of Israel? — the Cushites being the people of the far upper Nile, the most distant nation the audience could name.
Then the argument. Did I not bring Israel up out of the land of Egypt — the exodus fully affirmed — and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir? God claims the migrations of Israel's two most despised neighbors, with the same verb.
So the exodus is not unique as an act of God. It was unique as an act of covenant, the distinction chapter 3 drew: you only have I known Amos 3:2. Privilege of relationship, no monopoly on providence. And Kir is where the book's first oracle sent the Syrians Amos 1:5 — the place they came from becomes the place they return to.
Verse 8 gives the sentence and then the exception, in one breath: the sinful kingdom destroyed, except that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob.
Verse 9 supplies the image, and it needs reading carefully. Israel is sifted among the nations as grain is sifted in a sieve — and the clause that follows is yet not the least kernel will fall to the ground. A sieve loses the dust and keeps the grain. What is described is not annihilation but separation, and the thing worth keeping is not lost in it. Verse 10 names who does fall: those who said disaster would never reach them.
held with reason What this mark means