Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Ezra · About this commentary
The Names Recorded
Ezra 10:18-44
18 Among the sons of the priests there were found who had married foreign women: of the sons of Jeshua, the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, Eliezer, Jarib, and Gedaliah. · WEB
The list begins with the high priest's own family, and the book ends on a sentence about children with no word of approval anywhere in it.
The register that closes the book is organized like the one that opened it, and the order is the striking part.
It begins with the priests, and the first family named is the highest in the community: of the sons of Jeshua, the son of Jozadak, and his brothers. Jeshua had rebuilt the altar Ezra 3:2 and refused the offer of partnership Ezra 4:3. His descendants head the list of offenders, named individually.
Nothing is shielded. Priests come first, then Levites, singers and gatekeepers, and only afterward the lay families. A community that had excluded priests for lacking documents Ezra 2:62 now documents its priests' failures first.
Verse 19 records what the first group did: they gave their hand that they would put away their wives; and being guilty, they offered a ram of the flock for their guilt.
The pledge is a hand given — the book's recurring image, used here of men binding themselves. And the guilt offering is an admission: they are treated as having sinned, and the sacrifice concedes it rather than settling a dispute about whether they had.
Then names, house after house, to the end.
And the book stops. All these had taken foreign wives. Some of them had wives by whom they had children.
That is the last sentence. There is no dedication, no blessing, no assembly rejoicing as at the Passover Ezra 6:22, and no word from God — not in this chapter, not in the previous one. Nowhere in either chapter is the measure commanded, approved, or credited to divine instruction. The narrative reports it and ends, and the final clause it chooses to end on is the one about the children.
Two facts belong beside that silence. A prophet of the same period speaks against the man who divorces in the harshest terms available Malachi 2:16. And the same problem is found again a generation later Nehemiah 13:23–25, so whatever was accomplished here did not hold.
What can be said with confidence is narrow. A community small enough to disappear took an extreme step against a danger the law had described as the loss of its worship, under pressure, in the rain, over the objection of four named men. The account is unflinching about all of it — including its own ending, which offers no verdict and asks the question rather than answering it.
one view among several What this mark means