Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Genesis · About this commentary
Seven years, and in the morning it was Leah
Genesis 29:15-30
15 Laban said to Jacob, “Because you are my relative, should you therefore serve me for nothing? Tell me, what will your wages be?” · WEB
The man who impersonated an elder brother in the dark is given the elder sister in the dark, and told the younger never comes first.
Laban's opening offer sounds like generosity and is a negotiation: Because you are my relative, should you therefore serve me for nothing? Tell me, what will your wages be? He establishes that Jacob is an employee before Jacob has thought of himself as one.
The daughters are introduced in a single verse, and the description of the elder has been argued over for centuries. Leah's eyes were weak, but Rachel was beautiful in form and attractive. The word for Leah is uncertain and the English translations divide — weak, tender, delicate — and what is unambiguous is the structure of the sentence, which sets one sister's eyes against the other's whole appearance and leaves the comparison unflattering.
Jacob's offer is extravagant. I will serve you seven years for Rachel, your younger daughter. Seven years of labor is far beyond a normal bride price, and he names it himself without being pressed. He is also, in that sentence, careful to specify your younger daughter, which becomes painfully relevant.
And then one of the loveliest lines in Genesis: Jacob served seven years for Rachel. They seemed to him but a few days, for the love he had for her.
What follows is the wedding, and the narrative reports it with a deadpan that has never been improved on. There is a feast, with all the men of the place; it is evening; Laban brings his daughter; and then: In the morning, behold, it was Leah!
The mechanics are not explained beyond what the scene supplies — a veiled bride, darkness, and a night of feasting — and the writer plainly does not think it needs explaining.
Jacob's protest is three furious questions: What is this you have done to me? Didn't I serve with you for Rachel? Why then have you deceived me? The verb he uses is the one Isaac used of him: Your brother came with deceit Genesis 27:35.
And Laban's answer is the most devastating sentence anyone says to Jacob in this book, precisely because he does not know what he is saying: It is not done so in our place, to give the younger before the firstborn.
The man who put on his brother's clothes to take the firstborn's blessing from a father who could not see is told, by a father-in-law he cannot see through, that the younger does not come before the firstborn. He is deceived in the dark by a substituted sibling, using a disguise, at a meal — every element of what he did to Isaac, returned. Genesis makes no comment. It does not need to.
The settlement doubles his service. He finishes the bridal week for Leah, receives Rachel, and works seven more years — fourteen in total for a woman he had already earned once.
And the chapter's last clause sets up everything that follows: he loved also Rachel more than Leah. Two sisters in one household, one loved and one not, with a lifetime in front of them.
settled What this mark means