Kept for this visit
Notes, starred verses and bookmarks kept while signed out last until this visit ends. Create a free account and everything you keep here moves into it, saved for good.

Biblion Bible Commentary

Read the introduction to Genesis · About this commentary

Dinah, and a covenant used as a weapon

Genesis 34:1-31

1 Dinah, the daughter of Leah, whom she bore to Jacob, went out to see the daughters of the land. · WEB


A daughter is violated, her brothers turn the sign of the covenant into a trap, and her father's only objection is that it has damaged his reputation.

The chapter is the ugliest in Genesis and every party in it behaves badly except the one person who never speaks.

Dinah goes out to see the women of the country and is seen by the prince of the land. The verbs are stacked and they are not ambiguous: He took her, lay with her, and humbled her. What follows is stranger — his soul joined to Dinah... and he loved the young lady, and spoke kindly — and the combination is not a contradiction in a world where a man could take a woman first and negotiate afterward. It is a proposal made from a position of having already done the thing.

Jacob's reaction is the first indictment: Jacob held his peace until they came. His daughter has been violated and he waits for the men to come in from the fields. He says nothing to Hamor, nothing to Shechem, and nothing recorded to Dinah.

The brothers' anger is the only honest emotion in the chapter, and the narrator endorses its ground: he had done folly in Israel... a thing that ought not to be done.

Then the negotiation, and the two sides are transacting different things. Hamor talks about intermarriage, land and trade — a merger. Shechem offers any price. And the brothers answer with deceit, which the narrator states before quoting a word of it.

What they propose is the atrocity of the chapter, and it is not the killing. They demand circumcision — the sign God gave Abraham, the token of the covenant, the mark of belonging to the promise — and they demand it as the setup for a massacre. The one thing in their possession that speaks of God is picked up and used as a weapon.

Hamor sells it to his city on frankly commercial grounds, and the sentence gives him away: Won't their livestock and their possessions and all their animals be ours? He is not converting anybody. He is buying a rich family by an operation.

On the third day, when they were sore, Simeon and Levi go in with swords and kill every male in a town that has just accepted the sign of their God on their word. Then the rest of the brothers plunder it and take the women and children captive — which is worth stating plainly, because the avengers of one woman's violation end the day carrying off other men's wives.

And Jacob's response is the second indictment, and it is the more damning of the two. You have troubled me, to make me odious to the inhabitants of the land... I am few in number. They will gather themselves together against me and strike me.

Not a word about the dead. Not a word about the covenant sign. Not a word about Dinah. His complaint is reputational and tactical, and it is about himself throughout — me, me, I, I, my house.

The brothers get the last word and it is unanswerable as a question and no defense at all as an argument: Should he deal with our sister as with a prostitute? No, he should not have. And that does not make a city of corpses a reply.

Jacob does eventually say what should have been said, on his deathbed, and it is a curse rather than a rebuke — their anger is called fierce and their wrath cruel, and both tribes are scattered for it Genesis 49:5–7.

Dinah does not speak in the chapter. Nobody asks her anything, before or after.

settled What this mark means