Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Jeremiah · About this commentary
Write This Man Down as Childless
Jeremiah 22:20-30
20 “Go up to Lebanon, and cry out. Lift up your voice in Bashan, and cry from Abarim; for all your lovers have been destroyed. · WEB
The king is called the signet on God's own hand and then pulled off it, and the sentence that closes the chapter ends the dynasty without ending the promise.
The chapter turns to a boy king who reigned three months and was deported, and the image chosen for him is the most intimate in the book. Though Coniah... were the signet on my right hand, I would still pluck you from there. A signet was the instrument by which a man's authority was made real. It was worn on the hand and never lent, the one object that stood for the person. To say the king is that, and then to remove it, is to say that the office had real standing and that the standing is not a guarantee. He is cast out with the mother who bore him, and the historical record names them both going into Babylon together 2 Kings 24:15.
The question the passage asks about him is asked in the voice of the street, and it has the pity of a crowd in it: is this man a despised broken vessel, a jar nobody wants? The jar of chapter 19 had been smashed on purpose in a valley. Here the same word is applied to a person. The question is left standing rather than answered, which is the passage's one concession to how young he was and how little of the ruin he had caused.
Then the triple address — O earth, earth, earth, hear Yahweh's word! — and the sentence: record this man as childless, a man who will not prosper, for no more will a man of his offspring prosper, sitting on David's throne and ruling in Judah. The word childless has to be read with the clause that follows it, because the man was not childless; his sons are on record 1 Chronicles 3:17. What is closed is not his family but his line's access to the throne, and the sentence says so in the same breath.
That leaves a real question, and the book answers it in the next chapter rather than leaving it open. The promise to David was that a son of his would always have the throne, and this verse appears to end it. What follows immediately is a Branch raised to David — not through the reigning house's succession but from the root, by God's own act. He reigns and does what these kings would not Jeremiah 23:5. The two passages are consecutive on purpose. The dynasty as an institution is finished. The promise is not, because the promise never depended on the institution's competence. And the line itself continues in the record through this same cursed king Matthew 1:12, which is the strongest possible statement that the throne is given rather than inherited.
held with reason What this mark means