Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to John · About this commentary
They Would Not Enter
John 18:28-32
28 They led Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium. It was early, and they themselves didn’t enter into the Praetorium, that they might not be defiled, but might eat the Passover. · WEB
They will not go into a Gentile house in case it defiles them, on the morning they are arranging a killing.
They led Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium. It was early, and they themselves didn't enter into the Praetorium, that they might not be defiled, but might eat the Passover John 18:28.
The verse is one of the most quietly damning in Scripture and it does not comment on itself.
Entering a Gentile residence would have made them ceremonially unclean and cost them the festival meal. So they stand outside on the pavement while the man they have condemned overnight is taken in, and the whole conversation with the governor has to be conducted by a man walking in and out.
What is being protected is a ritual purity for a feast that commemorates a lamb whose blood turned death aside. They are scrupulous about the doorstep and untroubled by the errand.
The writer does not moralize about it. He records where everyone was standing and lets the reader do the arithmetic — which is this Gospel's method throughout.
The note also carries the chronology this book keeps John 19:14. On this account the Passover meal is still ahead of them on Friday evening, and the crucifixion happens while the lambs are being killed. How that is squared with the other accounts is set out in the front matter; what is not in dispute is that this writer has placed the death of Jesus at the hour of the sacrifice, and means his readers to see it.
"What accusation do you bring against this man?" John 18:29.
Pilate begins properly. A Roman magistrate opens by asking for the charge, and he is entitled to one.
"If this man weren't an evildoer, we wouldn't have delivered him up to you" John 18:30.
The answer is not a charge. It is an assertion that they would not be there if there were nothing in it — an appeal to their own authority in place of evidence, and it is what people say when they do not want the case examined.
"Take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law" John 18:31.
Pilate tries to hand it back, which is the response of a man who can smell a religious quarrel. It will not be the last time he tries.
"It is illegal for us to put anyone to death."
And here the real business appears. They do not want a verdict; they want an execution, and only Rome can give one. The sentence concedes that the outcome was fixed before the governor was involved.
That the word of Jesus might be fulfilled, which he spoke, signifying by what kind of death he should die John 18:32.
The writer adds the reason it mattered. Their own law's penalty was stoning; Rome's was the cross. He had said three times that he would be lifted up John 3:14 John 8:28 John 12:32, and the jurisdictional refusal at this door is what makes that the manner of it.
settled What this mark means