Kept for this visit
Notes, starred verses and bookmarks kept while signed out last until this visit ends. Create a free account and everything you keep here moves into it, saved for good.

Biblion Bible Commentary

Read the introduction to Luke · About this commentary

The Least Among You

Luke 9:46-50

46 An argument arose among them about which of them was the greatest. · WEB


An argument about rank is answered with a child, and a complaint about an outsider is overruled.

An argument arose among them about which of them was the greatest Luke 9:46.

The timing is the rebuke. He has just told them he will be handed over to men, and they were afraid to ask what he meant; the conversation they are capable of having instead is about precedence. The scene is in the earliest account Mark 9:30–50.

Jesus, perceiving the reasoning of their hearts, took a little child, and set him by his side Luke 9:47.

The detail is this account's own. The other tellings have the child in the middle; here he is placed by his side — beside him, in the position of honor at his own right hand, which is precisely the seat they were arguing about. The answer is not only an illustration; it is an appointment.

"Whoever receives this little child in my name receives me. Whoever receives me receives him who sent me" Luke 9:48. The chain runs upward in three links, and the bottom of it is a child with no standing. Receiving such a person is the whole of the transaction, and it reaches God.

"For whoever is least among you all, this one will be great." The question they asked is answered rather than dismissed. There is a greatest, and the way to it runs in the opposite direction from the argument.

John answered, "Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we forbade him, because he doesn't follow with us" Luke 9:49.

John's remark comes straight out of the argument he has just lost, and the account puts it there for that reason. The reasoning is the same reasoning: there is an inner group, and this man is not in it. The stated ground for stopping him is not that he failed, and not that he was a fraud — the exorcism seems to have worked. It is that he doesn't follow with us.

"Don't forbid him, for he who is not against us is for us" Luke 9:50.

The correction is brief and it sets a generous default. The line is drawn at opposition rather than at membership, and the presumption runs toward inclusion.

The same speaker says something that looks opposite elsewhere — he who is not with me is against me Luke 11:23 — and the two are addressed to different people about different questions. One is spoken to an individual weighing whether to commit; there is no neutral ground for him. The other is spoken to insiders assessing an outsider, and it tells them their scope for excluding people is narrower than they assumed.

settled What this mark means