Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Mark · About this commentary
New Wine, and Lord of the Sabbath
Mark 2:18-28
18 John’s disciples and the Pharisees were fasting, and they came and asked him, “Why do John’s disciples and the disciples of the Pharisees fast, but your disciples don’t fast?” · WEB
Fasting, patches, wineskins, and grainfields — four answers that say the same thing: something new has arrived that the old containers cannot hold.
"Can the groomsmen fast while the bridegroom is with them?" Mark 2:19.
Asked why his disciples feast while John's and the Pharisees' fast Mark 2:18, Jesus answers with a wedding. Fasting is for absence and longing; the bridegroom is here, and mourning at a wedding is not piety but confusion. The claim hiding in the image is enormous — in the prophets, the bridegroom of God's people is God Isaiah 62:5 Hosea 2:19–20 — and the shadow falls in the same breath: the days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them Mark 2:20, the book's first hint of the cross, filed under a feast.
"No one puts new wine into old wineskins... but they put new wine into fresh wineskins" Mark 2:22.
The patch and the wineskins generalize the point. New cloth on an old garment tears it; fermenting wine bursts a stiffened skin. The kingdom is not a repair to existing religion — it is new wine, still working, and the old containers of fast-days and precedent cannot flex around it. The image judges nothing about the old but its capacity: the skins were good skins once; they simply cannot stretch again.
The Pharisees said to him, "Behold, why do they do that which is not lawful on the Sabbath day?" Mark 2:24.
Plucking grain by hand in a neighbor's field was lawful Deuteronomy 23:25; the charge is Sabbath work — harvesting, by the tradition's classifications. Jesus' defense reaches for David: fleeing Saul, he ate the priests' showbread, which is not lawful to eat except for the priests Mark 2:25–26 1 Samuel 21:3–6 — Scripture itself recording, without censure, human need outranking ritual restriction. The argument assumes what it implies: as David with his men, so great David's greater Son with his.
"The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Therefore the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath" Mark 2:27–28.
Two sentences that must be kept together. The first restores the day's design: made for man — made, at creation, as gift Genesis 2:2–3 Exodus 20:11; a fence-work of prohibitions had inverted giver and beneficiary, and Jesus reasserts the direction of the blessing. The second stakes the claim under the whole dispute: the Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath — not its abolisher but its owner, the one with authority to say what his day is for. The verse unseats the tradition, not the day; what the Lord of the Sabbath does with his Sabbaths, the next scene immediately shows Mark 3:1–5 — he heals on them.
settled What this mark means