Biblion Bible Commentary
Read the introduction to Matthew · About this commentary
Seventy Times Seven
Matthew 18:21-35
21 Then Peter came and said to him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Until seven times?” · WEB
Peter offers a generous limit on forgiving and is given a number meant to end the counting — then a parable about a debt nobody could pay.
"Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Until seven times?" Matthew 18:21.
Peter has been listening, and the question follows straight from the procedure just given. His figure is generous — more than anyone would have required of him — and it is still a ceiling. The trouble with a ceiling is what it implies about the eighth time.
"I don't tell you until seven times, but, until seventy times seven" Matthew 18:22. The number is not a raised limit. It is an answer designed to destroy the arithmetic, and anyone keeping a tally to four hundred and ninety has stopped forgiving and started auditing. There is an old echo in it too: a man in the line of Cain boasted of avenging himself seventy-seven fold Genesis 4:24, and the scale of the vengeance is turned into the scale of the pardon.
Then the parable, which is Matthew's own.
"One was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents" Matthew 18:24. The figure is deliberately absurd. A talent was many years' wages for a laborer, and ten thousand was the largest number the language had a word for; the sum is larger than the annual revenue of the province. This is not a debt anyone could work off. It is a number chosen to make repayment impossible.
"Lord, have patience with me, and I will repay you all!" Matthew 18:26. The promise is sincere and it is nonsense, and it is exactly what a cornered man says. What he asks for is time.
"The lord of that servant, being moved with compassion, released him and forgave him the debt" Matthew 18:27. What he gets is not time. The debt is not rescheduled, reduced or secured against future earnings; it is canceled, and the loss lands entirely on the man who forgave it. That is what forgiveness costs, always — someone absorbs it.
"But that servant went out and found one of his fellow servants who owed him one hundred denarii, and he grabbed him and took him by the throat" Matthew 18:28.
The second debt is real. A hundred days' wages is a serious sum for a working man, and the parable does not pretend otherwise — the point is not that small wrongs do not matter. The point is the ratio, and the ratio is not close. The words the second man uses are almost the same words the first used minutes earlier, and in his case they were achievable: "Have patience with me, and I will repay you!" He could have. He is refused.
"Shouldn't you also have had mercy on your fellow servant, even as I had mercy on you?" Matthew 18:33. The charge is not that he failed to be nice. It is that he received something and did not let it change how he handled the next case, which means he never understood what he received.
"So my heavenly Father will also do to you, if you don't each forgive your brother from your hearts" Matthew 18:35.
The warning is severe and it is not a doctrine that pardon is earned by pardoning. The order in the parable runs the other way: the mercy came first, unasked for and total, and everything after it is response. What the ending says is that a forgiveness which stops at the recipient was never received at all — the same thing the prayer he taught them says in one line, and the only line of it he went back to explain Matthew 6:14–15.
And from your hearts closes the door on the procedure being used as a technique. The chapter has given a method for handling wrongs; it ends by saying the method is worthless without the thing it exists to serve.
settled What this mark means